- November 23, 2025
- 1:13 pm
- World News
If you like Trump’s peace proposal for Ukraine, you will also like his peace for Israel. The idea proposed by US President Donald Trump is seen by many as a justification for Russian war crimes. This concept not only ignores the fundamentals of international law, such as sovereignty, but also forgets the main thing — responsibility for aggression. The question is, at what cost peace and security for these countries?
Unjustified compromises and their destructive consequences
Lessons from history, such as Munich 1938, show how attempts at concessions can lead to catastrophic consequences. Forcing Ukraine into such compromises will signal to Russia, paving the way for further aggressive actions. This could undermine NATO’s security and sharply increase the risk of nuclear conflict, which threatens the entire world.
Trump’s promise of collective security for Ukraine seems unlikely. No matter how much faith is placed in these statements, it is hard to imagine that he is ready to risk nuclear confrontation with Russia for a country in which the US shows no real interest.
Contradictions in approaches: death as a path to peace?
Trump’s proposals regarding Ukraine cannot be taken seriously. They essentially require Ukraine to accept death as a given. They inspire parallels with the philosopher Tertullian, who said: “I believe because it is absurd.” Accepting such conditions is not a solution, but a surrender.
Analysis of peace proposals for Israel: no grounds for trust
Looking at Trump’s peace initiatives in the context of Israel, similar concern arises from his “20-point peace plan.” Despite Trump’s positive attitude towards the Jewish state, his approach does not inspire trust. Agreements with Qatar and Turkey only emphasize that ensuring Israel’s strategic advantage is no longer a priority for Washington.
Under pressure: Israel and the creation of an Arab state
Under growing pressure from Trump, Israel may face demands to participate in the creation of an Arab state on part of its territory. This could put the country on a path similar to Ukraine, where concessions and territorial losses have already become the basis of conflicts.
World law as the foundation of stability
Today, more than ever, it is necessary to adhere to international law to achieve a peaceful settlement. Non-compliance with these norms only increases instability and undermines security systems. Trump’s attitude towards peace proposals risks establishing chaos as the new standard on the international stage.
Uncertain consequences: increasing risks for regional stability
Trump’s proposed plan to create “stabilizing” forces in Gaza could become a factor exacerbating regional conflicts. There are no guarantees that countries supporting terrorism will not take advantage of the situation. This could play into the hands of Vladimir Putin, who is looking for opportunities to destabilize the situation in the world.
Strategic threats to Israel and nuclear risk
When it comes to nuclear threat, Israel finds itself in a vulnerable position. Potentially nuclear opponents, such as North Korea or Pakistan, may be interested in similar scenarios. This creates new challenges, including the threat of nuclear conflict, which questions the survival of the state.
Uncertainty and irrationality of the opponent
Today’s international relations require the realization that irrational actions of the opponent can pose a greater threat than classic “madness.” Such threats question the strategic security of countries and can lead to new forms of nuclear terrorism and wars.
Global instability: cascading consequences in other regions
The world requires a full understanding of how individual parts of the world can influence each other. Degradation in one region often leads to cascading consequences in others, worsening the global balance of power. The situation in Ukraine and Israel is a vivid example of how global instability can spread throughout the planetary context.
NAnews — Israel News | Nikk.Agency
