World on the brink: UN Security Council urgently discusses strikes on Iran and the risk of a major war

The emergency meeting of the UN Security Council showed the main point: the situation around Iran is rapidly turning into a global crisis, the consequences of which may extend far beyond the Middle East. UN Secretary-General António Guterres directly warned that further escalation could lead to a large-scale conflict with severe consequences for the civilian population and regional stability.

In essence, the diplomatic world is faced with a familiar scenario: military logic begins to outpace negotiations.

The UN warns of the risk of war expansion

Speaking at the emergency meeting, António Guterres stated that everything possible must be done to stop the further development of the conflict.

Position of the UN Secretary-General

Guterres condemned the US and Israeli airstrikes on Iranian territory, emphasizing that such actions raise serious questions from the perspective of international law and the provisions of the UN Charter.

According to him, the only way to prevent a catastrophic scenario is the immediate return of the parties to diplomatic negotiations.

The head of the UN also separately noted that Iran’s retaliatory actions have led to the violation of the sovereignty of several regional states — Bahrain, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.

Thus, the conflict is already effectively going beyond a bilateral confrontation.

In the international agenda, which is thoroughly analyzed by NAnews — Israel News | Nikk.Agency, the assessment is increasingly heard: the Middle East has reached a point where any wrong decision can trigger a security chain reaction.

The US and Israel claim the right to self-defense

The American side took a tough stance at the Security Council meeting.

Washington’s arguments

The US Permanent Representative to the UN, Mike Waltz, stated that the actions of the American military are legal and aimed solely at preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

According to him, this is not about politics, but about global security.

The United States, the diplomat emphasized, is taking measures it deems necessary to prevent a strategic threat.

The Israeli position was even more direct.

The Permanent Representative of Israel to the UN, Danny Danon, stated that the strikes were necessary to eliminate an existential threat.

According to him, Israel is acting proactively so that a radical regime with ballistic missiles and potential nuclear capabilities cannot threaten either Israelis or the world at large.

Iran’s response, Russia, China, and Europe’s reaction

The Iranian delegation sharply criticized the ongoing events.

The Permanent Representative of Iran to the UN, Amir Saeid Iravani, stated that as a result of the airstrikes, hundreds of civilians were killed and injured. He called the incident a war crime and accused the Security Council of ignoring Tehran’s warnings about rising tensions.

The Iranian diplomat posed a key question to the international community: can any state use force to determine the political future of another country.

At the same time, the representative of Iran did not comment on statements about the possible death of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, previously voiced by Western and Israeli politicians.

Russia condemned the US and Israeli strikes and demanded an immediate cessation of military actions. The Permanent Representative of Russia, Vasily Nebenzya, called for a return to diplomatic settlement based on international law and a balance of interests.

China took a more cautious position, expressing deep concern about the sharp rise in tensions and supporting the need for negotiations.

Simultaneously, the leaders of the UK, France, and Germany issued a joint statement calling for the resumption of the negotiation process between the US and Iran on the nuclear program.

European countries, meanwhile, sharply criticized Iranian strikes in the region and emphasized a principled position: the future of the country should be determined by the Iranian people themselves.

Currently, diplomatic statements are being made almost simultaneously with military events.
And this is what makes the situation especially dangerous — the world is trying to stop the conflict after the escalation has already begun.